|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
UT: What is the Second Amendment really about?
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Ask any gun enthusiast what the Second Amendment says and the answer will likely be a paraphrased version of, The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. But this is only the concluding half of the amendment.
The generally ignored opening clause provides an interesting premise for that conclusive final statement. A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the amendment begins. What does this mean, and why was it included? |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(10/14/2017)
|
"Robert Hammer is a health care financial analytics manager who has actually read and thought about the Constitution," reads a blurb on this site.
Too bad he apparently has only two working brain cells. His "thinking" (if it could be called that....) falls way short.
It's the age- old meme that the first clause of the 2A restricts the right to keep & bear arms to the "militia," meaning the military.
It's old bullhockey that has been deconstructed here and elsewhere long ago, but, like a bad penny, keeps popping up. |
|
|
