|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NY: Cortland County Town Says it won't Enforce Future State Gun Laws
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The Cortland County town of Solon declared Thursday night that it will not enforce any new gun restrictions from New York state, the Cortland Standard reported. The board unanimously approved the “Town of Solon Second Amendment Preservation Act,” which declares any future state restrictions on guns or ammunition -- including any fees, regulations or background checks beyond what is already required -- violations of the Second Amendment and “null, void and of no effect."
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(3/9/2020)
|
All well and good, but what about the unconscionable SAFE Act already in place? This resolution merely says that anything beyond the SAFE Act will be moot, but the egregious damage of that act will be respected.
Political prestidigitation, of you ask ME. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
