|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
China: Let's get graphic about effects of gunshot wounds in the United States
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A colleague in my office has finally answered for me some eternal questions: Is the AK-47 a better rifle than the M4? And which one is a more effective kill in an office environment like ours?
While we both agree an AK rifle would do a better job, I am beginning to have serious doubts about my colleague who sits close by. Luckily for me, we are in Hong Kong where the government bans guns.
If we were in the US, my colleague would probably already own an AR-15, which is the civilian version of the M4, or a semi-automatic AK, as most states ban fully automatic ones. I would have reported our conversation immediately to management, perhaps even called the police and called in sick. |
Comment by:
-none-
(1/2/2015)
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hiNgzhblM6Q
China's homemade gun! song jin 3,870
hypocrisy and desperation (for views) thick as his skull...China doesn't report this stuff as we do, or hides behind the language barrier and Western disinterest (with all things china and Chinese) |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|