|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
OH: Ohio officer acquitted in deadly shooting of pregnant woman in parking lot
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
An Ohio police officer who shot and killed a pregnant woman during a shoplifting investigation has been acquitted of murder and manslaughter charges.
In August 2023, 21-year-old Ta'Kiya Young was suspected of stealing bottles of alcohol when Blendon Township police officer Connor Grubb and a fellow officer approached her car in a Kroger parking lot.
Body camera video shows Grubb confronting Young inside her car and shooting her when she began to drive toward him.
...
On Friday morning, a jury acquitted Grubb on all counts he was facing.
Grubb’s attorneys maintain that the officer acted in self-defense and shouldn’t have been indicted, while lawyers for the Young family say they plan to file a lawsuit with the township. |
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(11/22/2025)
|
| Juries have gotten so stupid that cops can murder pregnant women (cuz cops have SUUUCH a hard job and just want to go home at night to their famWEEZ) and you're guilty until proven innocent if your property is not approved by the crown (get Patrick Adamiak a pardon, but Trump's deep state chief of staff Suzie Wiles-aka "swampy suzie" is keeping Patrick's name off Trump's desk). |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
