|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
SC: South Carolina Law Would Make Kids Study Second Amendment for 3 Weeks Every Year
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
In August of last year, a 16-year-old high-schooler in Summerville, South Carolina, turned in a creative writing assignment about shooting his neighbor's pet dinosaur. The school's "zero tolerance" policy for guns prompted a search of the student's belongings that turned up no weapons. Nonetheless, he was arrested and suspended for what he said was a joke, if one in questionable taste.
South Carolina state Rep. Alan Clemmons hopes to use that incident to force public schools to dedicate three weeks each year to teaching a gun-focused curriculum developed or recommended by the National Rifle Association. |
| Comment by:
xqqme
(1/15/2015)
|
The real question: Exactly what will they be teaching? Will it be drivel or accurate history. Will the actual meaning of the Amendment be clearly set forth, or will they distort and bury it?
Will they bring forth the State Constitutional provisions that clearly show the Right to be one of the individual, and for the expressed purposes of self-defense, defense of one's home and family, defense of others, acquisition of game (hunting), for sport, and for other lawful purposes?
Or will the class material be taken from the Heller dissent, where learned scholars declare that the Right does not apply to the individual, and the phrase "shall not be infringed" allows for all kinds of licensing, fees, taxes, and other forms of prior restraint? |
| Comment by:
Sosalty
(1/15/2015)
|
| When I taught 5th grade American History I had to take some white out and an ink pen to rewrite the description of the 2nd Amendment in all 32 student textbooks. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
