
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
laker1
(6/23/2016)
|
Many liberals believe in the freedom of sugary drinks and pies. Ref: Michael Moore. |
Comment by:
jac
(6/23/2016)
|
That would be fine with me. No more 4473 forms.
|
Comment by:
hisself
(6/23/2016)
|
I will NEVER willingly give up my rights in any areas! |
Comment by:
PP9
(6/23/2016)
|
Ok, sure.
Sugary drinks-- legal to purchase and possess by everyone, including children and felons. No background check, no ID checked, no forms to fill out, no permit needed to own or carry anywhere in the country, including into government buildings, and no restrictions on methods of storage. No registration of any kind, nor are any records kept of the purchase. No limits on number purchased per unit of time.
Cigarettes-- all of the same except that they are not legal for children, and ID will sometimes be required to substantiate that.
So yeah, if the left wants to restrict it so that McDonald's can only lawfully sell certain sizes of guns with no ID or paperwork out of the drive-thru window in New York City, that would be fine.
|
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|