|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(10/14/2017)
|
Here's more of that twaddle about only the militia bearing arms.
Hellen did away with this nonsense. It's like a monster movie.....you think you've slain the creature it comes back and tries to eat you again. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(10/14/2017)
|
| Hellen..dang autocorrect....US V. HELLER.. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/14/2017)
|
Re: Title
No, they wouldn't.
The public understanding of the people's right to arms rested on the fact that there were no differences between military arms and civilian arms. Arms WERE military arms. They are the only kind of arms that existed, which means that the people fully expected to be armed in parity with a standing military. Sorry if that puts a hole in your canoe, but that's the fact, Jack. |
| Comment by:
lucky5eddie
(10/14/2017)
|
| Sounds like they are busy trying to rewrite history to meet their agenda and not the facts. Facts be dammed. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| ...If a man lies under oath or procures the lie of another under oath, if he perjures himself or suborns perjury, he is guilty under the statute law. Under the higher law, under the great law of morality and righteousness, he is precisely as guilty if, instead of lying in a court, he lies in a newspaper or on the stump; and in all probability, the evil effects of his conduct are infinitely more widespread and more pernicious. — Teddy Roosevelt - May 12, 1900 |
|
|
