|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/9/2016)
|
The premise is BS and the author is a despicable propagandist. |
Comment by:
PP9
(7/11/2016)
|
People are killed by police fairly often. Is the NRA required to speak out on each one before the facts have come in? I know that's what Obama and other leftists would do ("the police... acted stupidly...), but is that really the right idea?
The left is desperate to make sure the NRA is portrayed as intolerant haters of most everyone, as the recent shootings have had vulnerable populations (blacks, gays) interested in arming themselves for self-defense, in defiance of the orders of their political masters, who have told them that being defenseless makes us all safer.
The left MUST make every issue into a white male vs. everyone else contest, since they claim ownership of the "everyone else" group.
|
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|