|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(8/17/2015)
|
Another worthless opinion from a brain dead liberal.
I'm glad that this woman lives in in environment where she is completely safe, but many of us don't have that luxury.
If her opinion took effect that would include guns for hunting. The deer, feral hog and coyote population is already out of control in many areas, and without hunters would only get worse.
I suggest that she move to formally great Britain where she can cower in her house while the hoodlums rob it with the residents at home. There she will have her wish for a disarmed populace where apex weapons are often a club or knife because of the complete lack of firearms and restrictions on self defense. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
