|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MI: Guns in Michigan - Different Views
Submitted by:
Corey Salo
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
How long has it been since you have had a calm, reasoned discussion with someone you don't agree with on gun rights?
Most of us have strong opinions one way or the other, and in this time of personalized information streams, sometimes it’s hard to understand why smart people can think so differently on this issue.
The Center is offering a chance to hear smart people on both sides of the issue present what they actually think and why, both with each other and then directly with the audience.
Join us at 7pm on October 17th in Hillberry A&B in the Student Center Building. There will be a moderated dialogue between the speakers, and then moderated conversation in a coffeehouse-type atmosphere. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(10/14/2016)
|
will discuss common ground as well as differences in the balance between gun ownership and public safety.
If the 'common ground' entails the need to 'balance gun ownership against public safety', the premise being that gun ownership is detrimental to public safety, I don't find anything in common with you.
Somehow I think I can avoid paying $5 to find out if it's as bad as I think it's going to be. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/14/2016)
|
| "We know of no other enumerated constitutional right whose core protection has been subjected to a freestanding 'interest-balancing' approach. The very enumeration of the right takes out of the hands of government - even the Third Branch of Government - the power to decide on a case-by-case basis whether the right is really worth insist-ing upon. A constitutional guarantee subject to future judges’ assessments of its usefulness is no constitutional guarantee at all. Constitutional rights are enshrined with the scope they were understood to have when the people adopted them, whether or not future legislatures or (yes) even future judges think that scope too broad." - D.C. v. Heller (2008) |
|
|
