|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/26/2019)
|
| This Obama judge hangs a fat, slow pitch over the plate, and this must needs be pounced upon for pursuit up to certiorari. Swing for the guddam fences. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(7/26/2019)
|
Another judge who does not understand what "SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED" means.
"Common use? ? ?" That's not in the 2A. It isn't a criteria. They may not be "necessary" for some home defense but the AR-15 is a good weapon for it. It is also good for outside use ... and situations involving multiple attackers.
Like antifa .... which seem plentiful out there in the land of fruit and nuts.
|
| Comment by:
lbauer
(7/26/2019)
|
Denying "common use" was a feeble attempt by this judge to duck a direct challenge by avoiding the common use guideline as set by the SCOTUS Heller decision.
Yeah, I know, it's all a violation of our 2A rights, but you have to play the hand you're dealt, and this judge was just caught cheating. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
