|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NY: SCOPE President on SAFE ACT: An open letter to the New York State Senate Republicans
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"In the 2014 election cycle dozens of New York candidates ... signed the SCOPE Candidates Pledge which read, ... I pledge to support the repeal of the NY SAFE Act and oppose any similar gun-ban legislation at the local, state, and federal level."
"Due in part to the support from the gun owners of New York State ... Republicans were thus able to reclaim the majority in the New York State Senate."
"On March 3rd of this year delegations from ... across New York traveled to Albany to ask their legislators to refuse to pass a budget that included funding for the NY SAFE Act."
"We noted that signing onto 'repeal' legislation while voting to fund implementation of the SAFE Act was contradictory and unacceptable." ... |
| Comment by:
teebonicus
(4/29/2015)
|
| It appears to me that "message of necessity" needs to be challenged in court as circumventing true republican government, as stipulated in the Constitution. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
