|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Did restrictive New Jersey gun laws kill Carol Bowne?
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"A brutal murder case in southern New Jersey has put that state’s restrictive gun laws in the spotlight, and yesterday’s National Review fingered the 'deadly consequences' of those laws as police hunted for the man they believe stabbed a woman to death earlier this week."
"Carol Bowne had applied for a gun permit in April. She had a protective order against a man who has been described as an ex-boyfriend, but he allegedly killed her, anyway. So much for the deterrent effect of a piece of paper against someone determined to harm." ... |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(6/10/2015)
|
NJ law requires the resident's 'controlling authority' respond to applications for FOIDs or handgun purchase permits 'within 30 days'. The Police Chief in her jurisdiction didn't. When questioned, he stated he 'wasn't aware of the time limit' . IOW a bureaucratic "FU" to Ms. Browne and her surviving family he'll not be penalized for !!
My eldest, a licensed EMT, whose license requires both state and federal background certifications, experienced the same delays. He moved out of NJ.
We'll never know if having a hand gun would have saved Ms. Browne, but CCW isn't possible for ordinary citizens in NJ. But far better to make your case to twelve than be carried by six. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence. Thus when my eldest son asked me what he should have done had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908 [by an Indian extremist opposed to Gandhi's agreement with Smuts], whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defend me, I told him it was his duty to defend me even by using violence. Hence it was that I took part in the Boer War, the so-called Zulu Rebellion and [World War I]. Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. — Mohandas K. Gandhi, Young India, August 11, 1920 from Fischer, Louis ed.,The Essential Gandhi, 1962 |
|
|
