
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
ID: Doctor: Guns Kill People
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Safety is one of the most considered aspects of day to day living. It is always better to be safe than sorry. In ensuring that you are safe, it is recommended that you should learn how to use any kind of an item for the purpose of self defense. There has been a notion that you need to learn martial arts in order to enhance your self-defense techniques. |
Comment by:
netsyscon
(10/12/2017)
|
Hey Doc's, how many of your patients die each year due to errors, neglect etc. Quite a few. So can it on guns. |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(10/12/2017)
|
Again the meme that a gun in the house is more of a danger than a help. Yet between 500,000 and 1,000,000 people use guns to defend themselves each year. Years ago a study "proved" a gun in the home was 43 times more likely to kill or injure a home owner or family member than be used on a intruder. The methodology used to obtain this was dishonest in the extreme and required the inclusion of gang houses, drug runners homes, meth labs, suicides, and other avoidable criminal activities. That lie is still circulating, like a bad penny.
|
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|