|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/23/2019)
|
"This is not, by any means, a part of some conspiracy to take an individual's guns away," said Senator Taylor.
Okay, so what's it do?
Oh, wait....
.....IT TAKES INDIVIDUALS' GUNS AWAY.
I mean, really. Is this not classic Red Queen insanity? |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(9/23/2019)
|
Yes it is. More and more reasons will be found to "red flag" someone. Even in states that already have these laws it is near impossibke, or very costly, to get the guns back.
In one state, a man had his guns taken when it was KNOWN he was NOT the actual targeted person.
It DID NOT matter: BE STILL CANNOT GET HIS GUNS BACK!!!!!!!
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| You are bound to meet misfortune if you are unarmed because, among other reasons, people despise you....There is simply no comparison between a man who is armed and one who is not. It is unreasonable to expect that an armed man should obey one who is unarmed, or that an unarmed man should remain safe and secure when his servants are armed. In the latter case, there will be suspicion on the one hand and contempt on the other, making cooperation impossible. — Niccolo Machiavelli in "The Prince." |
|
|
