|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(4/16/2021)
|
There is no such thing as common sense gun laws.
All of these proposals will only affect law abiding citizens and won't to anything to reduce violence and criminal use of firearms.
The people proposing and supporting this legislation are sick. |
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(4/16/2021)
|
| Go to the effort of leaving a civil comment on this extremely biased article. They're using "DISQUS" and they moderate all posts (eyeroll). One mindless and illogical anti gun post got through. Flood them with civil comments and make them moderate intelligent posts. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/16/2021)
|
All one has to do is to recognize the names of these two miscreants, and reading the article becomes non-essential.
They are anti-Constitution statists, so, what's the point?
Everything, EVERYTHING they stand for is counterfeit. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
