|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MI: Senate must not falter on common-sense gun control
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The legislation at issue is the most common-sense kind of incremental regulation, far from the space of affecting legal gun ownership and focused directly on loopholes that help the flow of guns into hands that shouldn’t have them.
Who can argue, for instance, that individuals who make the no-fly list because of suspected ties to terrorism should maintain access to weapons?
Ed.: How about the ACLU, for starters. |
| Comment by:
Sosalty
(6/17/2016)
|
| And you would like America to accept your definition of 'common sense' with our law makers track record on non-prosecution of evildoers, open borders, and gun sales to terrorists? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
