|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
MI: Military-grade weaponry unneeded in public spaces
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
“A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed” reads the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
However, I ask: Why so many guns? Why high-capacity magazines and clips? Why military-style guns? Why rapid firing? Why concealed guns? I would be interested in hearing from anyone who can offer answers to these questions. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(2/4/2021)
|
"Why so many guns? Why high-capacity magazines and clips? Why military-style guns? Why rapid firing? Why concealed guns?"
Typical liberal ninny.
The Second Amendment guarantees our natural right to bear arms suitable for militia use.
The author assumes that there is a point zero where no rights exist, then proceeds to create a framework of limits on 'rights' the government may (not shall) grant.
Bass ackwards.
"Liberals are people who stand on their heads and insist that the world is upside-down." |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(2/4/2021)
|
The second amendment really does not lend itself to wide interpretation. Those who "interpret" it want to twist it to mean something contrary to what it actually means. If you have a good dictionary you can find out what WORDS MEAN, and then you won't need an "interpretation."
Because you will COMPREHEND what it means. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to permit the conquered Eastern peoples to have arms. History teaches that all conquerors who have allowed their subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by doing so. Indeed I would go so far as to say that the underdog is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty. So let's not have any native militia or police. German troops alone will bear the sole responsibility for the maintenance of law and order. — Adolf Hitler, April 11, 1942. (Source: "Hitler's Table-Talk at the Fuehrer's Headquarters 1941-1942", Dr. Henry Picker, ed. (Athenaeum Verlag, Bonn, 1951).) |
|
|
