|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NC: Gun laws need some checks and balances
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Just sitting here wondering what the gun-happy, scared-of-their-own-government people might do if their government tells them that laws have to be passed to try and prevent guns from getting in the hands of a terrorist. Every time the government mentions passing laws making it harder for the mentally ill to get a gun, the NRA and the gun manufactures spend millions of dollars playing on the fearful convincing them into believing their government is coming after everybody’s guns. Some of the same laws to keep guns out of the hands of the mentally ill would have to be passed to keep guns out of the hands of a terrorist — be they domestic or foreign. |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(11/27/2015)
|
"Checks and Balances" implies some justice is involved. But where's the "justice" in disarming a citizen on the unsubstantiated whim or suspicion of some faceless bureaucrat ? It certainly isn't in the "secret government lists" where a citizen can't - except at exorbitant personal expense - even discover their listing, let alone contest it. It isn't in pre-supposing certain classes of individuals should be disarmed ala the DHS.
So this is yet another pean mindlessly confirming the essential truth of Ronal Reagan's famous "five frightening words" . |
| Comment by:
jac
(11/27/2015)
|
You don't believe that I should own guns.
I don't believe you should be allowed to vote. Your stupidity should make you ineligible to register to vote.
It is basically the same thing. Both are rights guaranteed to citizens of the United States. The same rights are non existent in much of the world.
If you don't like the gun laws in the USA, I suggest you move to France or Great Britain. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
