|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(4/14/2021)
|
"We have a gun problem. We have a gun problem in Nebraska. That rhetoric is not helping us solve the problem," [Vacarro] said.
We have a Constitution. The last time I checked, Nebraska was part of the United States.
Violating the Bill of Rights creates a whole new set of problems; it doesn't remedy one we already have.
Ms. Vacarro et al are among those who are willing to sacrifice liberty for what they (mistakenly) perceive as "safety."
See: Ben Franklin
"Those who give up essential liberty for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Selah. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|
