|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Amazon Partner GoDaddy Allegedly Kicks Pro-Gun Site Off Servers
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Web hosting service and Amazon partner GoDaddy allegedly removed AR15.com from its servers, forcing the site to shift to a backup URL to say visible. The Washington Examiner reported that AR15.com presents itself as “the world’s largest online firearm community.” It is a place where members can get ask each other questions about guns and gun accessories, and enjoy a vibrant exchange of ideas related to the Second Amendment. But the site is now searching for a new hosting service. |
| Comment by:
repealfederalgunlaws
(1/12/2021)
|
| GOOD! ar15.com is a bad forum anyway run by some real lowlifes no better than zuckerberg. It's not a pro liberty board by any stretch and they worship government as bad as the moveon commies. AR15.com is populated by just a tiny group of paranoid old guys who like their echo chamber. They're ultra paranoid and it's extremely difficult to even get an account there. I noticed that almost no email address domains are allowed when you try to register. Opinion censorship is over the top, just like farcebook has become. It's one of those dark spots on the web where only the clubhouse regulars who have 10k posts matter. They finally got karma'd. Kinda funny. Couldn't happen to a worse bunch. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
