|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
ID: Put the gun down; get out your wallet
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Please tell us you know that deadly force can not be used to defend property.
Please tell us you understand that the only legal justification for drawing a weapon and using it is in the defense of your own life or the lives of other innocents.
You can’t draw a gun on a graffiti artist.
You can’t use your AR-15 to stop the proverbial brick through the insured plate glass window.
You can’t use your semi-automatic against looters (unless, of course, you’re defending your own property). |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(6/11/2020)
|
Please point to anyone lawfully bearing arms who did any of those 'boogyman' things that terriify your miniature intellect.
We'll wait...
[crickets] |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
