|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Kids and Guns: Why Pediatricians Aren't Talking With Patients About The Risk
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
We’re used to doctors asking about habits that may affect our health, from smoking to having sex. And that’s also true of the pediatricians who take care of our children by educating parents about how to minimize everyday health risks.
"Pediatricians are comfortable talking about seat belts and poisons and stuff because we all, just through living, have exposure to those things," Garen Wintemute, an emergency room doctor and public health researcher at the University of California, Davis, told Newsweek. Other less widespread risks, like smoking, are discussed extensively in medical schools. "Firearms are different; firearms aren't an unmitigated hazard like smoking, and firearms have legitimate uses." |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(9/15/2017)
|
Unless you've had your head buried in the sand for the last couple of decades, there's been plenty of discussions about kids, guns, and safety going on. My father inculcated gun safety in me fifty years ago before so many whiney politicians wanted the medicos to yap at us.
America need not continue encouraging doctors to commit boundary violations, the .gov ought to shut up and repeal ObummerCare! |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/15/2017)
|
"This information is pretty generalizable, even though it's a skewed population," Yanger said, noting that most of the respondents work in urban hospitals affiliated with universities.
Though subdued, the article does identify the crux of the problem - the vast majority of doctors (at least those surveyed) are liberal urbanites, who disapprove of guns in general outside very limited exceptions like "sporting purposes", and a lot of them, not even then. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
