
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
TX: Community fills up Lone Star College for campus carry forum
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
As state legislators move closer to expanding gun rights at public colleges and universities, Lone Star College System officials conducted two public forums to educate the community on the proposed laws and gather feedback.
A March 31 forum at LSC-CyFair featured an overview of the two bills—House Bill 937 and Senate Bill 11—and a discussion of the pros and cons if they were to pass. The event was open to students, faculty and community members and drew hundreds of attendees. |
Comment by:
teebonicus
(4/2/2015)
|
In the seven states that allow campus carry, none of the dire prognostications advanced by opponents have materialized. None.
No sexual assaults, no rapes, no robberies, no muggings, no drunken frat party shootouts, no threats or shootings of professors by disgruntled students, NOTHING.
Conversely, in all the rest of the states (i.e. that prohibit campus carry), all of those things have happened and are happening on or around campuses.
Instead of allowing irrational fears to influence this decision, rely instead on the facts and the evidence.
The evidence is that there are no deleterious effects of a campus carry policy in the states that allow it, and the usual crimes that stoke people's fears happen where campus carry is prohibited.
|
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|