|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/6/2019)
|
Yeah, well, that was about a clear as mud.
Using that many words and circumnavigation makes understanding your rights worse, not better.
Regarding one's home:
1) obvious lethal aggression from another resident with no avenue of retreat, or
2) person breaks and enters and continues to advance when confronted, or
3) person with no right to be there refuses to leave and signals violent intent
Those are the basic three. Under those conditions it's likely that no charges would be filed.
In all cases, you must be able to demonstrate that authorities were called at the earliest possible opportunity.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(12/6/2019)
|
| (stink) |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
