|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
AZ: GOA wants McCain loss next week
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
A gun-rights group trying to unseat U.S. Sen. John McCain in next week's Republican primary says it supports his GOP challenger.
Dr. Kelli Ward is challenging McCain in the August 30 primary, hoping to defeat the longtime senator.
Erich Pratt of Gun Owners of America, which has endorsed Ward, says Ward and McCain are in a "dead heat" after a third GOP candidate dropped out earlier this month.
Echoing that suggestion, a Breitbart story cites a May poll showing Ward tied with McCain in a two-person race.
"So we know that this is going to be very close," he tells OneNewsNow. "We're very optimistic about this race." |
| Comment by:
Sosalty
(8/28/2016)
|
| Thank you John for your service to our country. Please elect somebody that can consistently vote for sound policies, and it's not someone who shot a burro in the Grand Canyon stating that it charged him. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
