|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
CA: Sheriff an enforcer, not a judge
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"It feels a bit silly to write this, as what I’m going to say is so blatantly obvious, but unfortunately there seems to be a need to say this. The sheriff’s job is to enforce laws, not act as a judge as to whether the laws are constitutional — that’s what the judicial system is for. Having a law enforcement officer unilaterally declaring a law unconstitutional is blatantly unconstitutional in itself and is more akin to totalitarianism." ... |
Comment by:
jac
(6/17/2015)
|
People like this letter writer make me cringe.
The sheriff swore an oath to uphold the constitution. Many of the laws coming out of the legislature and by proposition are blatantly unconstitutional, however that doesn't stop the liberals from passing them and liberal courts from upholding them, nonwithstanding the constitution. A prime example is the four liberals on the supreme court of the US that have demonstrated their contempt for the constitution time and time again.
When a LEO has to chose between the constitution and the law, his duty is to uphold the constitution. |
Comment by:
Millwright66
(6/17/2015)
|
Mr. Werdinger should have paid more attention in Civics. A sheriff is an "elected law enforcement responsible only to the electorate". His oath of office is to 'support and uphold the Constitution of the United States' and he - and the his jurisdiction's electorate - are the determinants of what that shall be.
Our nations Sheriff's are the 'law-enforcement arm of the people', and not subservient or bound to their state or the federal government. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence. Thus when my eldest son asked me what he should have done had he been present when I was almost fatally assaulted in 1908 [by an Indian extremist opposed to Gandhi's agreement with Smuts], whether he should have run away and seen me killed or whether he should have used his physical force which he could and wanted to use, and defend me, I told him it was his duty to defend me even by using violence. Hence it was that I took part in the Boer War, the so-called Zulu Rebellion and [World War I]. Hence also do I advocate training in arms for those who believe in the method of violence. I would rather have India resort to arms in order to defend her honor than that she should in a cowardly manner become or remain a helpless witness to her own dishonor. — Mohandas K. Gandhi, Young India, August 11, 1920 from Fischer, Louis ed.,The Essential Gandhi, 1962 |
|
|