|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Pro-Georgia Gun Permit Bill Advances Amid Charleston Senator’s Filibuster
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The state Senate worked past midnight Wednesday, after Sen. Marlon Kimpson began his attempt to block the advancement of a bill that lets South Carolina recognize Georgia’s concealed weapons permits. Kimpson, D-Charleston, was forced to start his filibuster against the bill when several attempts to end the day’s session late Tuesday failed. The bill ultimately cleared another hurdle, but senators voted to delay debate on the amendments to the third and final vote. |
| Comment by:
teebonicus
(6/1/2016)
|
| That there nigra needs to siddown and shaddup. |
| Comment by:
stevelync
(6/1/2016)
|
The Democrap Party IS the party of gun control and gun bans.
If you're a gun owner and you're voting for a Democrap, you are no different than a Jew who would have joined a Nazi SS Division because you believe in the cause. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
