|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
RI: Richmond Council Postpones Second Amendment Sanctuary Vote
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
After considerable discussion, Town Council members agreed to postpone a vote on a resolution declaring the town a Second Amendment sanctuary until a larger venue could be found to accommodate all residents who wished to speak. The resolution topped Tuesday’s council meeting agenda, and the council chambers was filled beyond capacity, forcing many people to wait outside. The discussion came on the heels of Monday’s vote in Hopkinton to approve the resolution.
|
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(5/13/2019)
|
To anti-2A ninnies, any law they deem "reasonable" or "sensible" cannot possibly infringe a constitutional right, by virtue of its "reasonableness" or "sensibility".
Which, of course, is absolutely ridiculous. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| Those, who have the command of the arms in a country are masters of the state, and have it in their power to make what revolutions they please. [Thus,] there is no end to observations on the difference between the measures likely to be pursued by a minister backed by a standing army, and those of a court awed by the fear of an armed people. — Aristotle, as quoted by John Trenchard and Water Moyle, An Argument Shewing, That a Standing Army Is Inconsistent with a Free Government, and Absolutely Destructive to the Constitution of the English Monarchy [London, 1697]. |
|
|
