|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Well Regulated
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
are no comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"Like most reasonable people, I’m disgusted with what happened in Newtown Connecticut last Friday. ... On Facebook and other social media, I started to see prayer chains, calls for peace ... but then I noticed a few outlandish items slowly start to creep in that bothered me. ..."
"'If the staff had been armed this could have been prevented.'"
"Let that sink in for a minute. Arming teachers. In elementary school. Am I the only person who hears this and thinks, 'That person must have been dropped on their head as a small child?' If you think that arming teachers is an answer to this issue, I’m not even sure you should be a part of the conversation that needs to happen." ... -------
Submitter's Note: Once again we see that disdain for the Second Amendment invariably spills over onto other civil rights like free speech. |
No
Comments found for this Newslink
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|