|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Mia Farrow: ‘Humans Are a Species That Should Not Have Guns’
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 5 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Actress and left-wing activist Mia Farrow tweeted responded to a revenge shooting in the Bronx by tweeting “humans are a species that should not have guns.”
Farrow was reacting to a New York Daily News report of 18-year-old Luis Rivera driving up alongside 24-year-old Nelson Caban on the Bronx Expressway and shooting him dead. Caban had allegedly shot and wounded Rivera eight months earlier.
|
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(6/15/2021)
|
Note to Mia Farrow:
"GUNS RESERVED FOR VULCANS ONLY."
Mia, shut up. You're an idiot. Stick to the scripts and MAYBE people will think you're smart. Or atleast think you're an actress .... maybe .... |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(6/15/2021)
|
She's right!
I'm transferring ownership of all my firearms to my dog. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(6/15/2021)
|
Phorto, are you sure you're not barking up the wrong tree?
**** Comments section has gone to the dogs. ;) ********
Bow-wow. |
| Comment by:
jac
(6/15/2021)
|
| Who is Mia Farrow? Does anyone care? |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(6/15/2021)
|
An ancient actress. I think she was in a movie about BONNIE AND CLYDE back in the 1970s.
If I'm wrong .... I don't care ..... ;) |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
