|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
TX: Court Addresses Ruling On Guns at Facility
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The Bell County Commissioners Court will be sending a letter to the Texas Attorney General’s office in regards to a citation it received for violating the government code and penal code by refusing to allow licensed handgun holders in the Bell County Justice Center. Commissioners unanimously approved an order to discuss and take action on the issue Monday morning. “This is the first step we need to take to see what will be appropriate action for us to take on this,” County Judge Jon Burrows said. “We want to do what is right, but we have an obligation to the public to protect the public. We need to be able to have the authority to deal with the AG’s (attorney general’s) office on this.”
|
| Comment by:
teebonicus
(5/10/2016)
|
What you need to do, gentlemen, is to obey the law.
Simple. |
| Comment by:
jac
(5/10/2016)
|
| Simple solution. Keep your metal detector and exempt anyone with a valid carry permit. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
