|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jac
(10/27/2015)
|
Just maybe, 5 percent of the gun stores are selling the majority of guns used in crimes because they are located in or near the hood where the hoodlums live.
The home boys aren't going to drive 20 miles when they can buy a gun within walking distance or a bus ride.
Close down those 5 percent of the gun retailers, and the next closest stores will be supplying 90 percent of the crime guns.
This is not a "common sense" gun control measure. This is just another attack on gun retailers and owners. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(10/27/2015)
|
| She is a Democrat, therefore she is a STINGKER. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
