
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Is the NRA wrong? New study shows guns rarely used for self-defense
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 6 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Personal safety is one of the most-cited reasons to buy a gun. But a new study challenges the assumption that firearms are often used for self defense.
The Violence Policy Center found that a very small proportion of firearm homicides can be attributed to so-called justifiable situations. Just one gun death per every 32 criminal gun killings happened in self-defense scenarios in 2012, the most recent year for which data is available. And, while gun advocates argue that they want a firearm handy in their house in case of an intruder, just 0.1 percent of the justified attacks involved property crimes. |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(4/22/2016)
|
Violence Policy Center??!! !! ??
I wouldn't believe that festering bag of jackwagons if they told me july follows june. |
Comment by:
Longenecker
(4/22/2016)
|
Who said anything about homicides? |
Comment by:
jac
(4/22/2016)
|
I trust John Lott a lot more than the Violence Policy Center. They are nothing more than a left wing liberal mouthpiece with an agenda to remove guns from society.
By their logic using a gun for self defense doesn't count unless one kills someone. That amounts to very stupid reasoning in my opinion. |
Comment by:
dasing
(4/22/2016)
|
They must have done the study on Mars, nothing like that on Earth. |
Comment by:
laker1
(4/22/2016)
|
That is because most self defense gun uses result in no shots fired. Just the presentation of the firearm settles the issue. VPC blowing smoke again. |
Comment by:
Ron_
(4/24/2016)
|
"But if it just saves one life." |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|