|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Obama Gun Grab on Social Security Recipients Part of Long-Term Citizen Disarmament End Game
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
"'Seeking tighter controls over firearm purchases, the Obama administration is pushing to ban Social Security beneficiaries from owning guns if they lack the mental capacity to manage their own affairs, a move that could affect millions whose monthly disability payments are handled by others,' The Los Angeles Times reported Saturday. 'There is no simple way to identify that group, but a strategy used by the Department of Veterans Affairs since the creation of the background check system is reporting anyone who has been declared incompetent to manage pension or disability payments and assigned a fiduciary.'" ... |
| Comment by:
laker1
(7/21/2015)
|
Next lists of prohibited;
1.anyone collecting disability
2.all whites buying guns (racists)
3. anyone living 100 miles of US borders (possible drug dealers)
4. all former military (patriot extremists)
5. anyone who has ever received counseling (crazy)
6.anyone who wants to purchase a gun (domestic terrorists)
7. White cops ( racists) |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(7/21/2015)
|
The 'crucial point' of this latest edict, like other before it, is it grants bureaucrats supremacy over constitutionally-enshrined "citizens' rights". Where does this precedent stop ? How long before some President ( or Congress) decide our bureaucracy can curtail/revoke individuals' first amendment rights ? Or their fifth ? All based upon their participation in an entitlement program based upon their age, or physical condition ?
Lots of retireds find assigning some fiduciary authority to trusted family to maintain a residence or other recurring obligations while they devote themselves to travel a convenience. Doubtless some bureaucrats would deem this a 'qualifying condition' under this new pogrom. |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(7/21/2015)
|
The 'crucial point' of this latest edict, like other before it, is it grants bureaucrats supremacy over constitutionally-enshrined "citizens' rights". Where does this precedent stop ? How long before some President ( or Congress) decide our bureaucracy can curtail/revoke individuals' first amendment rights ? Or their fifth ? All based upon their participation in an entitlement program based upon their age, or physical condition ?
Lots of retireds find assigning some fiduciary authority to trusted family to maintain a residence or other recurring obligations while they devote themselves to travel a convenience. Doubtless some bureaucrats would deem this a 'qualifying condition' under this new pogrom. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| No kingdom can be secured otherwise than by arming the people. The possession of arms is the distinction between a freeman and a slave. He, who has nothing, and who himself belongs to another, must be defended by him, whose property he is, and needs no arms. But he, who thinks he is his own master, and has what he can call his own, ought to have arms to defend himself, and what he possesses; else he lives precariously, and at discretion. — James Burgh, Political Disquisitions: Or, an Enquiry into Public Errors, Defects, and Abuses [London, 1774-1775]. |
|
|
