|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
PP9
(10/2/2022)
|
I know I'd be more than happy to know which businesses to boycott... put up such a sign and yours is one of them, whether or not I am actually carrying. See if banning and alienating a large percentage of potential customers is good business. One of your competitors surely will be happy to accept your rejects, and their money.
A sign prohibiting certain objects would not likely be enough for trespass in and of itself. Prosecutions for trespass would only happen if the people carrying guns fail to leave when asked. If they should choose to disregard your signs, how are you going to know whom to ask to leave? You do know what the meaning of "concealed" is, right?
|
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
Are we at last brought to such humiliating and debasing degradation, that we cannot be trusted with arms for our defense? Where is the difference between having our arms in possession and under our direction, and having them under the management of Congress? If our defense be the real object of having those arms, in whose hands can they be trusted with more propriety, or equal safety to us, as in our own hands? — Patrick Henry, 3 J. Elliot, Debates in the Several State Conventions 45, 2d ed. Philadelphia, 1836 |
|
|