|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
jughead
(11/7/2017)
|
| i dont think the second has anything to do with hunting. more i read the more it seems to be to keep a rogue nation in line. the gov is supposes to be working for us not the other way around |
| Comment by:
dasing
(11/7/2017)
|
| THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN ASSUALT RIFLE...assault troops use select fire (machine guns) weapons. NOT assault weapons!!!!!!! |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(11/7/2017)
|
The whole of the English Language is now under assault. It's crazy.
The term "assault rifle" is actuall a "term of art." If I am attacking someone with a bolt action .22LR rifle, a single shot Flintlock Kentucky Long Rifle, or a Garand, I'm "assaulting" them .... so maybe what I'm using is an "assault rifle?" A Kentucky Flintlock is....an.... ASSAULT RIFLE?
No, assault rifles --meaning AR type --- are actually used for shooting contests, sports, and, yes, HUNTING. There are other calibers available (.308 and .300 blackout) that are even better calibers for hunting the big stuff. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the citizens to keep and bear arms has justly been considered, as the palladium of the liberties of a republic; since it offers a strong moral check against the usurpation and arbitrary power of rulers; and will generally, even if these are successful in the first instance, enable the people to resist and triumph over them. — Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States; With a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States before the Adoption of the Constitution [Boston, 1833]. |
|
|
