|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Tested: Yankee Hill Machine HRC-200
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The HRC-200 is a direct-gas-impingement, flattop-receiver AR-15 chambered in either 5.56x45 mm NATO or 6.8 mm SPC. The latter is reviewed here. The sample rifle was outfitted with YHM’s rifle-length MR7 handguard, an A2-style pistol grip and an A2 buttstock that are well-suited for long-range and hunting applications, and the furniture and receivers have been hydro-dipped in Kryptek’s Highlander camouflage pattern. As is implied by the model designation, the HRC-200 features a 20" barrel with YHM’s diamond fluting. Shipping with each HRC rifle is a second-focal-plane Bushnell Trophy 3-9X 40 mm riflescope that has been mounted in the company’s one-piece scope mount and zeroed at 100 yds. from the factory. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(10/27/2017)
|
| So, to go with a new ammo caliber called PRC, we now have Hillary Rodham Clinton (HRC) rifles? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
