|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Gun owners have a duty to stop this madness
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
We need more law-abiding responsible gun owners owning the Second Amendment and practicing it responsibly. We need to prevent monsters from having guns.
Start with age 21 to buy any gun.
It is currently legal for an 18-year-old boy to go to a store and buy an AR-15 if there is nothing negative in his background check.
The NICS system needs to be upgraded, improved and maintained with current data and sometimes a four-day delay becomes the standard wait.
If your life is in immediate danger and you need a gun today — borrow one from a law-abiding gun owner or stay in their dwelling. Go to a safe public place. Go stay in the lobby of a police station. |
| Comment by:
shootergdv
(9/7/2019)
|
| Many of those 18 year old "boys" can carry full autos in service of our country. My safe place is in my home - with an AR ! |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
