
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Comment by:
Stripeseven
(1/30/2019)
|
This elected servant needs to be forced to read the Federal Constitution, and the Bill of Rights before voting on firearms restrictions, and take a look at the affidavit that was required when that Oath of Office was taken. |
Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(1/30/2019)
|
Kamala Harris is a clueless dingbat who slept her way into political power.
Oh, btw, I've seen plenty of photos of gunshot wounds. They weren't pleasant to view, but they didn't effect my political views either. |
Comment by:
jac
(1/30/2019)
|
Maybe some of those kids would still be alive it the authorities allowed gun safety to be taught in schools. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|