
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Gun Free Zones Make Sense
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://libertyparkpress.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
This is not a column about the Second Amendment. This is not an argument for its abolishment or a liberal ploy to take all the guns away and deprive sportsman of their favored tool for hunting or keep people from protecting their families. While I firmly believe the Second Amendment should be read in its entirety and understood contextually, I can’t deny that it is in the Constitution. So, this isn’t a column about the Second Amendment. |
Comment by:
dasing
(2/20/2017)
|
Another "I like 2A, but...", there is no but, you either put your trust in 2A or you don't, no grey areas!! |
Comment by:
laker1
(2/20/2017)
|
Educated but its self evident irrational fear of self defense. Lady guns are there already. They are illegally carried |
Comment by:
jac
(2/20/2017)
|
Two bit newspaper wants a subscription to read their stupid opinion article.
Anyone that believes that victim disarmament zones work is a special kind of stupid. |
|
|
QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
"Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|