|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NV: Time for Nevada to put tracer ammunition in its crosshairs
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Tracer ammunition was developed so that soldiers could more effectively kill enemy combatants at night and over long distances. It was later was found useful in air warfare, where it helped pilots see the trajectories of the bullets fired from their planes.
So what need would there be for civilians to have tracer bullets?
There isn’t one, which is why some Americans may have been surprised by last week’s news that Stephen Paddock legally bought hundreds of rounds of tracer ammo before the Oct. 1 shooting. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(2/8/2018)
|
"But it’s equally easy to see how the stuff can be devastatingly dangerous in the wrong hands."
So, keep it out of the wrong hands, and leave the rest of us the hell alone.
Schmuck. |
| Comment by:
MarkHamTownsend
(2/8/2018)
|
"Tracers work in both directions," ~~Old military saying.
Tracers are most useful in belt fed crew served machineguns, allowing the operator to walk the fire into a precise area where he identifies an enemy position.
They also allow an enemy to observe where incoming fire is coming from.
I don't know if the Mandalay shooter used tracer rounds....I do know that if he had used them the authorities would likely have had an easier time locating Steven Paddock's position.
Ban away, fools. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
