|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
Could the Obergefell Decision Mean National Concealed Carry?
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
And Trevor Burrus, Research Fellow at Cato, warned, “If proponents want to bring a case on concealed carry and cite the Obergefell opinion, they are free to… [But] gay marriage [doesn’t] automatically convey a right to concealed carry in 50 states. Moreover, by using these spurious arguments, advocates … harm the overall movement for gun rights. Bad arguments can create bad precedents that could impair the expansion of the right to self defense.”
|
| Comment by:
teebonicus
(7/2/2015)
|
The proper way to enforce permit recognition is by Congress's Full Faith and Credit powers. In fact, it is exactly this kind of circumstance for which the clause was created.
Under Full Faith and Credit, Congress could also have mandated recognition of marriage licenses issued to gays.
That last may not be popular (I know it isn't with ME), but that is our Constitution, and that is a delegated power of the Congress pursuant to the 10th Amendment. |
|
|
