|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
NJ: Unlawful weapons charges dropped against N.J. man stopped with antique pistol
Submitted by:
Anonymous
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
Weapons charges against a Maurice River Township man found to be in possession of an antique handgun have been dropped, the Cumberland County Prosecutor's Office announced Wednesday.
Gordon Van Gilder, 72, of Port Elizabeth, had been returning home Nov. 19 after retrieving a nearly-300-year-old flintlock pistol from a Vineland pawn shop when his vehicle was pulled over by Cumberland County sheriff's officers in Millville. ...
Sheriff's officers cited seeing Van Gilder's vehicle "acting suspiciously in a known drug area" ahead of the traffic stop. |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(2/26/2015)
|
I wonder how many NJ residents visit/travel thru "known drug areas" completely unaware. Its not like there's signs posted ! If this is valid reason for a hostile traffic stop I - and fellow employees - should have been stopped multiple times a day when driving our trucks thru Princeton, Somerville, Raritan, Trenton, etc.
I'm delighted Mr. Nappen manage to rescue Mr. Van Guilder. I suspect the publicity his case received - and resultant pressure exerted upon the prosecutor - contributed to the change of heart. But it remains to be seen if Mr. Van Guilder gets his property back. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| There are other things so clearly out of the power of Congress, that the bare recital of them is sufficient, I mean the "...rights of bearing arms for defence, or for killing game..." These things seem to have been inserted among their objections, merely to induce the ignorant to believe that Congress would have a power over such objects and to infer from their being refused a place in the Constitution, their intention to exercise that power to the oppression of the people. —ALEXANDER WHITE (1787) |
|
|
