|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
SC: No Charges After Shooting at North Charleston Bar
Submitted by:
David Williamson
Website: http://keepandbeararms.com
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
The incident began with a verbal altercation at Willie’s Bar, located at 7880 Dorchester Road. The victim approached the subject and pulled a gun on him, prompting the subject to leave the bar and go to his vehicle to avoid further confrontation, according to Pryor. Pryor stated that once the subject entered his vehicle, the victim and another unknown person approached the subject’s car and the victim again showed his weapon and began to pull it. |
| Comment by:
mickey
(5/16/2016)
|
How many times can they say "the victim was the criminal perpetrator" with no sense of irony?
How about "the victim retreated to his vehicle before finally being forced to shoot his attacker"? |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| For, in principle, there is no difference between a law prohibiting the wearing of concealed arms, and a law forbidding the wearing such as are exposed; and if the former be unconstitutional, the latter must be so likewise. But it should not be forgotten, that it is not only a part of the right that is secured by the constitution; it is the right entire and complete, as it existed at the adoption of the constitution; and if any portion of that right be impaired, immaterial how small the part may be, and immaterial the order of time at which it be done, it is equally forbidden by the constitution. [Bliss vs. Commonwealth, 12 Ky. (2 Litt.) 90, at 92, and 93, 13 Am. Dec. 251 (1822) |
|
|
