|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
FL: Not the answer
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 2 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
I believe the answer to the problem of gun violence in America is mandating a thorough psychiatric analysis of the person who wants to purchase the gun. If the government were able to implement such a rule, people would not lose their right to bear arms and there will possibly be less shooting events in the media.
Mr. Kolesinski also believes that guns should be permitted on college campuses. As a college student, I do not believe that this is a good idea as it does not keep the unarmed students' interest in mind. I am neither for nor against the right to bear arms; however, I am completely for the right to a safe learning environment. |
| Comment by:
jac
(11/12/2015)
|
Just another brain dead liberal that wants to infringe our rights.
There is already a major shortage of psychiatrists in this country. And most of them are flaming liberals. Adding a requirement for psychiatric testing to buy a gun would slow the approval time to years. And who is supposed to pay for this?
Furthermore, psychiatric testing is voodoo science at best. It is not likely that it would identify more than a small percentage of the sickos.
My experience with psychiatrists is that most of them are as mentally ill as their patients. |
| Comment by:
teebonicus
(11/12/2015)
|
| So, to exercise 2A rights the people should have to forfeit their 4A rights? Get real. |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
