|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
Stripeseven
(9/10/2019)
|
| Expansion...You see.. one foot in the door, and they move for more, with no end in sight until their goal of total unconstitutional confiscation has been achieved. Serve not Rule. |
| Comment by:
jac
(9/10/2019)
|
Why stop there? Why not let anyone that has a beef against you ask the courts to take away your rights?
That's what the politicians want. More ways to disarm the entire population.
Except, the criminals will still have their guns. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(9/10/2019)
|
jac -
"Except, the criminals will still have their guns."
Allow me to rephrase that:
"Except, the criminals AND THE GOVERNMENT will still have their guns." |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
