|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
ATF Bans Popular Rifle Ammunition It Says Is “Armor-Piercing”
Submitted by:
Bruce W. Krafft
Website: http://www.keepandbeararms.com/
|
There
is 1 comment
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
... "As if in anticipation of Obama’s remarks, the ... [ATF] issued its latest broadside against the Second Amendment the day before, declaring that by definition 'green tip' M855 'ball ammunition' chambered in 5.56 mm is now 'armor piercing' and can no longer be manufactured, imported, or sold in the United States."
"In its 'framework' that exposes the twisted logic behind its unilateral decision in a mind-bending 17-page analysis, the ATF defines armor-piercing based how the cartridge is constructed, rather than how it may, or may not, penetrate armor. But that doesn’t faze the authors:" ... |
| Comment by:
Millwright66
(2/17/2015)
|
Troops in combat have long complained about the Nato-inspired M-855 round's poor terminal combat performance, calling it an "ice pick" when it comes to inflicting disabling wounds. Nor do they seem any too happy about its barrier penetration capabilities, if multiple reports I've read are to be believed.
So why would the current administration find fault with civilian purchase of a minimally effective combat round in large surplus ? Their "armor-piercing" contention seems mendacious when one peruses "after action" reports on its failures against even soft/improvised "body armor" employed by opposing forces. And any center-fire rifle round can be claimed to be "armor-piercing" . |
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| "Some people think that the Second Amendment is an outdated relic of an earlier time. Doubtless some also think that constitutional protections of other rights are outdated relics of earlier times. We The People own those rights regardless, unless and until We The People repeal them. For those who believe it to be outdated, the Second Amendment provides a good test of whether their allegiance is really to the Constitution of the United States, or only to their preferences in public policies and audiences. The Constitution is law, not vague aspirations, and we are obligated to protect, defend, and apply it. If the Second Amendment were truly an outdated relic, the Constitution provides a method for repeal. The Constitution does not furnish the federal courts with an eraser." --9th Circuit Court Judge Andrew Kleinfeld, dissenting opinion in which the court refused to rehear the case while citing deeply flawed anti-Second Amendment nonsense (Nordyke v. King; opinion filed April 5, 2004) |
|
|
