|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
FL: After newsroom shooting, take broader approach on firearm violence
Submitted by:
Mark A. Taff
Website: http://www.marktaff.com
|
There
are 3 comments
on this story
Post Comments | Read Comments
|
If you believe that America should accept regular mass killings as a price of the Second Amendment, turn the page or swipe on.
But if you believe that firearm violence shames this country and that our democracy could prevent needless tragedies and respect the Constitution, hear me out on this Independence Day.
Like many South Florida journalists of a certain age, I knew Rob Hiaasen. He and four colleagues at The Annapolis (Md.) Capital Gazette were murdered last week. |
| Comment by:
PHORTO
(7/5/2018)
|
"broader approach" indeed.
You mean, like getting off your asinine refusal to acknowledge that the most effective means to stop a gunman are having defenders' guns IMMEDIATELY PRESENT to neutralize the threat?
Like THAT?
No. Of COURSE not.
The Annapolis shooting went on for the (incredibly rapid) 60 seconds it took police to respond. In that time five people were killed and two more injured.
Yo. Dimwit. (1x7)+60=5 DEAD, 2 INJURED.
Or, put so simply even YOU can understand it, 2+2=4. |
| Comment by:
hisself
(7/5/2018)
|
First of all, the Constitution does not grant me any rights. It guarantees that the government will not infringe upon my God-given rights. So, ALL laws which in any way keep me from speaking, attending the church of my choice, peaceably assembling, or bearing the arms I chose are against the Constitution and therefore NULL and VOID!
Secondly, as shown by the examples of Chicago, Baltimore, and other democrat controlled cities, gun control does not work!
You forgot that the CDC DID study gun violence, and didn't like the results, so they hid the report.
To be continued - - - |
| Comment by:
hisself
(7/5/2018)
|
- - - Continuation
Gun control is prior restraint. Would you accept me taking your computer because you might write something evil or because someone else wrote something evil? I don't accept that you violate MY rights because someone else might do something wrong.
So, Mr. Schultz, take your big government, socialist, and dictatorial policies elsewhere.
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| The right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.' The right of the whole people, old and young, men, women and boys, and not militia only, to keep and bear arms of every description, and not such merely as are used by the militia, shall not be infringed, curtailed, or broken in upon, in the smallest degree; and all this for the important end to be attained: the rearing up and qualifying a well-regulated militia, so vitally necessary to the security of a free State. Our opinion is that any law, State or Federal, is repugnant to the Constitution, and void, which contravenes this right. [Nunn vs. State, 1 Ga. (1 Kel.) 243, at 251 (1846)] |
|
|
