|
|
|
NOTE!
This is a real-time comments system. As such, it's also a
free speech zone within guidelines set forth on the Post
Comments page. Opinions expressed here may or may not
reflect those of KeepAndBearArms staff, members, or
any other living person besides the one who posted them.
Please keep that in mind. We ask that all who post
comments assure that they adhere to our Inclusion
Policy, but there's a bad apple in every
bunch, and we have no control over bigots and
other small-minded people. Thank you. --KeepAndBearArms.com
|
The
Below Comments Relate to this Newslink:
| Comment by:
Uncommon1
(6/8/2016)
|
| Because an unloaded firearm can be used as a club instead. Where do these people come from? |
| Comment by:
mickey
(6/8/2016)
|
The same persecutor who sued the county for not giving her enough money to hire staff (she openly admitted that she had 40 known murderers she wasn't prosecuting because she didn't have the staff to press charges against them) is now saying she has her staff drafting legislation.
Which is it, Kym Worthless?
Are you too understaffed to handle murder prosecutions, or are you so overstaffed that all your prosecuting chores are done and you have staff left over for legislative lobbying?
Or, maybe you keep your staff too busy doing things that aren't in your job description that you don't have any staff left over for even the most important prosecutions of murderers and rapists?
|
|
|
| QUOTES
TO REMEMBER |
| As an individual, I believe, very strongly, that handguns should be banned and that there should be stringent, effective control of other firearms. However, as a judge, I know full well that the question of whether handguns can be sold is a political one, not an issue of products liability law, and that this is a matter for the legislatures, not the courts. The unconventional theories advanced in this case (and others) are totally without merit, a misuse of products liability laws. — Judge Buchmeyer, Patterson v. Gesellschaft, 1206 F.Supp. 1206, 1216 (N.D. Tex. 1985) |
|
|
